complicated data retention, the investigation of serious crimes? The working group on data retention has evaluated the police crime statistics and comes to the conclusion
that the suspicion independent data storage has so far not helped in the investigation of serious crimes. The police have found 2009 on 1.42 million to 1.36 million serious crimes in 2007, when the retention was not regulated by law. It was the detection rate in 2007 without retention still be 77.6 percent, with the detection of connection and location data in 2009, however, only 76.3 percent. This development was reflected by according to the Working Group reflected on the most serious Internet crimes, the number of 167 451 in 2008 rose sharply to 206 909 in 2009, while the clearance rate was simultaneously decreased from 79.8 percent to 75.7 percent.
Not that surprised me that seriously, especially likely to be mainly come in the prosecution of alleged copyright infringement for use in my experience the saved connection information anyway. However, these findings provide a new argument in the ongoing debate about the re-introduction of data retention.
every politician in discussions this promotes and demonstrates otherwise is neither international terrorism nor child pornography effectively get at, point out to you in future:
It has been proven statistically that the retention of the investigation of serious crimes, especially in the internet, more difficult!
can now sure of the correctness of this thesis, despite the objective data worthy of debate, like most such surveys in the evaluation. Known, it is supposed to trust any statistics that you have not falsified yourself. And the solid "end" is admittedly more polemical than mandatory. He moves quite the same level as the claims of proponents of a new data retention. With the small but almost smug difference to be able to relate to the actual figures of crime statistics.
only hope that the numbers might lead to a more objective discussion of a new legal regulation.