expert advice is always an exciting affair, because you previously never really know what the results of it.
In the specific case involved a contract that had been presented to my client at the police and is quite different from the copy difference that had accompanied the victim's complaint. The latter had a few days of trial in his examination of the document now under investigation clearly stated to have made any of the three allegedly derived from his signatures on the contract he did not know.
The expert, however, sees something different. "With high probability" of its assessment are to the relevant signatures of the witnesses.
Remarkably, the prosecutor took immediately following the hearing once the call to the audience seated on witnesses. Whether she has taken his presence as an opportunity to bring him from the now well be initiated investigation on suspicion of giving false testimony in knowledge? But one should already make the documentary reasons rather not writing? Or they discussed about the present situation and the display will be reimbursed to witnesses and take no investigation?
I'll ask at the next hearing a try.
0 comments:
Post a Comment