selling out the warning-claims? A little bit English
CSR explore new ways of alleged copyright infringement to silver.
After my client against the alleged damages in the amount of € 1,005.40 originally has sought to defend themselves, these were initially reduced to € 650,00. So far, so normal. When he still refused, they said then, now that the relevant arguments were exchanged, one of the alleged rights holder would recommend the initiation of legal action. I then asked her to call me in this case into court as authorized recipient.
While I now eagerly await the action, I will, however, disappointed again. Instead, announces it now, the alleged claim "to recover through a sale of accounts receivable. In other words, it "threatens" now trying to sell the alleged claims to a debt collection company or the like.
In my experience, these companies pay about 10% of the nominal value when, as here, the claim is not even dubbed. That would be in the current case, around 100 €. Then I ask myself, already, how safe it is, the enforceability of such a claim, ultimately, if they hawked for the famous Appel with the equally legendary egg. Or should that be just another threatening gesture? True to its motto: the claim buyer will complain determined, otherwise the debt purchase would be useless?
The case promises to be exciting!
0 comments:
Post a Comment