I would have never thought possible, but you can bias judges also concerned with a constructive and discuss peace above all. This happened at the District Court of Kaiserslautern.
The client is charged with suspicion of giving false testimony. He had both in his trial for theft and common witness disputed Vefahren against his alleged accomplices, the allegations of the indictment. In both procedures, the court did not believe him. Because of his testimony, he had to answer in court now. should be negotiated but before the same judge who had sentenced him only because of the theft of his appearance and not believed. This was my client and I, we, however, our problems.
the beginning of the trial, I therefore asked for a brief legal discussion to discuss the situation. Had I set to the beginning of a fierce struggle, but I found myself surprised. After brief discussion, acknowledged the judge concerned from the perspective of my client that he could understand the fear of embarrassment certainly, after having his statements have not even imagined. After a very substantive and friendly discussion of the situation they decided to stay the proceedings at first. We now clarify first the question of whether he can lead the process / may.
Why can not always run so? I maintain time, many procedures would be much more relaxed and more quickly at a reasonable end.
0 comments:
Post a Comment