Apparently was the appointment of yet more court's own purposes for the protection of procedural rights of my client as a witness. When my client first and obviously can not answer for the court most important question with reference to § 55 Code of Criminal Procedure did, I experienced my big surprise: He felt tricked by me, let me know the chairman, he had made clear in a telephone conversation, know what he would had I him.. informed that the client did not intend to testify, he would have dumped them and not me as a witness and Counsel at the expense of the taxpayer a great day in Berlin funded.
He ended the hearing with rage, no questions asked or ask questions for prosecution or defense.
Whether he knows how "generous" precipitates the appointment fee, which I paid by the taxpayers here? Hardly. Otherwise he could not be suggested seriously that I would take a "fun trip" to Berlin, which was associated with a lot of hassle and cost me a whole working day. From the much more intrusive questions, what he had promised to appear with my appointment of, apart altogether.
0 comments:
Post a Comment